Skip to Main Content

State of Elections

A student-run blog from the Election Law Society

Unique Ballot Proposal Could Bring Voter ID to California 

October 14, 2026

By Thomas Callahan

On Nov. 3, 2026, voters in California will cast their ballots on a variety of proposed changes to state law. One such proposal, Proposition 39, would dramatically change election law in California. 

(more…)

Topics: Constitutional Amendment or Revision Voter ID

Rocky at the Top: Filling the Coming Senate Vacancy in Tennessee 

October 14, 2026

By William & Mary Law Student Contributor

A senator looks in the mirror and sees a president. A governor looks in the mirror and sees a senator. And from time to time in the political past, the extraordinarily enterprising statesman has asked that magic mirror: why not both? An answer to that question may be found in a notorious historical precedent.  

(more…)

Topics: U.S. Congressional Vacancies

Virginia’s Potential State Constitutional Amendment and Voting Disenfranchisement

October 14, 2026

By William & Mary Law Student Contributor

Virginia may have the most elections of any state; however, Virginia has often been credited as being the most difficult state to vote in, especially for those convicted of a felony. During the election cycle this year, Virginians will have three amendments to vote on: (1) reproductive healthcare; (2) marriage equality; and (3) voting rights restoration for formerly incarcerated individuals. The third amendment is the most relevant to election law.  

(more…)

Topics: Constitutional Amendment or Revision Restoration of Voting Rights

Maryland’s VRA and the Uncertain Future of State Responses to Callais

September 30, 2026

By Peter Favret

Earlier this year, in April, Maryland became one of three states to pass a new state-wide Voting Rights Act in 2026. Delaware and New Jersey also passed state voting rights acts this year. The action takes place against a backdrop of a little over a decade of Supreme Court decisions that decreased the breadth and power of the original 1965 act. Provisions that were scaled back include the preclearance provision (Section Five), which required certain “covered jurisdictions” with a history of racial discrimination to obtain advance approval from the federal government before making changes to voting procedures, and Section Two, the provision banning racially discriminatory voting practices.

(more…)

Topics: State VRA

Power to the People? Ballot Questions Revisited

September 30, 2026

By Francesca Ferraro

In 1918, Massachusetts voters narrowly—51.28% to 48.72%—approved an amendment to their state constitution establishing a state process of initiative and referendum. Born of the populist and progressive movements that swept the nation at the beginning of the twentieth century, Massachusetts’s citizen ballot proposal provision, known as Article 48, has proven to be wildly successful: Of the 192 ballot questions presented since the amendment, a whopping 115 have been approved—the majority of which have introduced a legislative constitutional amendment. And in a state famous for its high-powered party politics, supporters tout the provision as a way for voters to pursue the issues that matter most to them when the legislature has other priorities.  

(more…)

Topics: Campaign Finance Initiatives and Referenda

Taxation Without Representation in D.C.: Citizenship Makes No Difference

September 30, 2026

Originally a rallying cry during the American Revolutionary War, “End Taxation Without Representation” is now used as part of Washington D.C.’s campaign for a vote in Congress. Even though D.C. residents pay federal taxes, they are unable to vote in Congressional elections. This sad fate is shared with millions of people across the United States. People without American citizenship, regardless of their residency, are equally unable to vote in any federal elections despite paying federal taxes. Most noncitizens are also banned from voting at all levels of government. Uniquely, this is not the case for noncitizen residents of D.C. They just recently earned the right to vote.  (more…)

Topics: Voting Rights

Who Gets to Call the Play? Coach for Governor and the Fight Over Alabama’s Residency Requirements

September 30, 2026

By Elizabeth Flachbart

Alabama’s gubernatorial race, which will be decided at the polls this November, has revolved less around the issues and more around one candidate’s residency – is Senator Tommy Tuberville, the Republican candidate for governor, really a Florida man? Tommy Tuberville has served as one of Alabama’s senators since 2020, after defeating incumbent Doug Jones (a Democrat who is famous for successfully prosecuting Ku Klux Klan members for the 1963 bombing of the Birmingham 16th Street Baptist Church). Tuberville’s brand is centered around his support from President Trump and his former career as a college football coach for Auburn University. Tuberville is now running to replace Governor Kay Ivey (R), who is no longer eligible to run because of term limits, and is facing off against his former opponent Doug Jones. However, Tuberville’s biggest obstacle this campaign cycle has been growing questions over whether he meets Alabama’s 7 year residency requirement for governors.

(more…)

Topics: Ballot Access – Candidate Qualifications – Candidates

Voting Beyond State Borders: New Jersey’s Controversial Voting Law

September 30, 2026

In 2022, New Jersey amended its state voting regulations, extending the ability for New Jerseyans who are living abroad to vote beyond Congress’ Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act. New Jersey, in accordance with Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution, is permitted to control the time, place and manner of its elections, and thus, on its face, New Jersey’s voting regulation does just that. However, with the midterm elections on the horizon, New Jersey Republican Committee members, including Michael McGuire, a candidate running for the 3rd District House seat, are suing the state, asserting that the 2022 updated voting law enables certain individuals who have never been to the United States (let alone New Jersey) to participate in the New Jersey voting process.

(more…)

Topics: Military and Overseas Voter Eligibility

A ‘State’ of Limbo: The Puerto Rico Question

September 30, 2026

The Puerto Rican public has yet again called for statehood. On June 10, 2026, Puerto Rico’s Resident Commissioner, Pablo Jose Hernández, introduced H.R.9246, the Puerto Rico Democratic Self Determination Act (“Self Determination Act”). If passed, the Act would mandate a plebiscite to resolve Puerto Rico’s political status on March 14, 2027, with the result binding the federal government. The introduction of the Act followed a referendum conducted in 2024, where 56.82% of Puerto Ricans voted in favor of statehood when given a choice between statehood, independence or sovereignty in free association with the United States. If enacted, the Self Determination Act would give Puerto Ricans the right to decide whether they want to become the 51st state, and by extension, gain access to federal electoral power. If the vote resulted in a majority in favor of statehood, the Act mandates Puerto Rico’s admission as a State of the Union, the initiation of federal elections of Senators and Representatives, and changes to federal laws as they apply to Puerto Rico regarding taxation; health care; housing; transportation; education; and entitlement programs. 

(more…)

Topics: Initiatives and Referenda Voting Rights

The Latest American Citizens To Be Disenfranchised

September 30, 2026

By Paige Moskowitz

After losing the 2024 North Carolina Supreme Court election by 734 votes, Judge Jefferson Griffin contested the validity of over 65,000 mail-in ballots. Most of the ballots Griffin challenged came from voters with allegedly incomplete voter registrations and issues with ID requirements.  

But a small portion of the challenged votes—260 ballots, to be exact—came from “never resided voters.” These are American citizens who were born abroad and have never lived in the United States, but inherited voting rights in North Carolina because it was their parent’s last domicile. Oftentimes, these are children of career military or foreign service personnel. While these citizens may visit the U.S. regularly throughout their lives, they have never lived long-term in the country. 

(more…)

Topics: Military and Overseas Voting Rights